Rising Republican Star Arrested For Harassing Woman Who Dumped Him

Low life bigoted rednecks apparently are welcome with open arms in the GOTP .

They're a dime a dozen down here.

Makes one wonder, if their mothers were being abused at their conception!!!

All that Jesus makes you a little crazy...

Amen!

What's making these people crazy is NOT Jesus.

The actual cause of these peoples' insanity lives much farther south...and in a much warmer climate.

Of course!

He's focused. Determined. Loyal. Willing to go that "extra mile".

Look out Santorum and Romney!

The Dems do it too!

Daniel A. Hallo:

The Dems do it too!

Then write or seed an article about a "rising star" Democrat sitting in jail (or ROR) for harrassing his or her ex.

Until then...

See that proves it.
Busted!

One of these days, this country will grow up.

Today isn't it.

True. Someday a cure will be found for the ultraconervtives.

Pattie your not right about that,they say NO all the time,no to birth control,no to gay rights, no to equal rights,no to taxes on the wealth,no to good education,no to anything that doesn't promote their agenda.and no to any responsibly of their own for the actions they take.

You're right, Mike! It's the application of the word "NO" to their personal behavior that they can't stand. The rest of us learned this during our pre-kindergarten days, but that's also the time when most of us learned that the world did not revolve around us, which is a lesson that they never learned. Once again, poor parenting. For each one of these guys, there is a mommy and a daddy who messed up.

And his parents probably put down single women whose sons become President

This is more like a male thing than a partisan thing.. another good reason a women's place is in the house...

and senate.

Ya man, were doing the Kid N' Play here....

Oke doke. I hear this phrase often but because liberals never stick to one definnition of any word or term or phrase, I thought I would ask for my own clarification.. Thanks.

Shaun how about I simply report your comments instead.

We shall see.

I have reported you as a malicious user Shaun 6869.

I appreciate the timely moderation Soph.

#17.3 alos reported, and well deserved.
Is this kind of talk really necessary shaun?

I appreciate the timely moderation Soph.

You think she just sits at her computer 24 hours? lol

It's 8:00 in the U.K. She's probably out to dinner.

Thanks Soph. :-)

Barb just curious when did you change your name?

Barb just curious when did you change your name?

Just fighting injustice.

Sorta like Pelosi's recent $10,000 a day retreat?

Is Congresswoman Pelosi from South Carolina? No? Then why did you think it was pertinent to a conversation about South Carolina?

Is Congresswoman Pelosi from South Carolina? No? Then why did you think it was pertinent to a conversation about South Carolina?

Did not realize this was a conversation about SC…….although there have been several of the liberals here who have opted to trash the good State instead of the individual on topic …!!! But of course, those are clearly identified for what they are…!!

PCMan, then address the ones who are trashing the innocent.

Defend South Carolina instead of attempting to drag a completely irrelevant person into the conversation. Congresswoman Pelosi is not involved in South Carolina's scandals, nor in its beauty, good people, or politics.

But of course Crow we understand. That statement sort of puts a derogatory light on every politician instead of the one singled out here. And I am well within the guidelines for comment here. You box doesn't appear to be green on my screen.

tesla013:

That statement sort of puts a derogatory light on every politician instead of the one singled out here.

Which politician? The one from South Carolina, or the former Speaker of the House who you singled out - who has absolutely nothing to do with the one from South Carolina?

And I am well within the guidelines for comment here.

You are certainly within the letter of the CoH. That in and of itself does not mean your comment contributes anything valuable to the discussion.

You box doesn't appear to be green on my screen.

Please report me if you sincerely believe that a request to stay on topic is a prerogative of moderators only. You can use the "Report Bug" link at the top of this page

When the day comes Crow that I rely on you to determine if my comments have merit I will leave the Vine. Goodness when are folks ever going to learn???

Nice deflection attempt

Bootstraps:

Dems are self gifted as the virtue of Character is not on the platform for their spotlighted narcissists.

Thanks, but I've already had my fill of word salad today.

The one thing that really gets me is that Republican men have proven that they dislike women intensely

Absurd statement.

They all push insulting policies designed to hurt women, deny recognition of our rights as free citizens, disrespect our decision-making capabilities, and relegate us to second-class status. What is absurd is this misogynist mindset. Yeah, they like cozy vaginas, but that is not the same as liking and respecting their fellow citizens.

#23.2 Good grief!!!!!

I suggest a little anger management, combined with some social reality.

Refer to #23.1, again.

Even in anger, the truth can be spoken. The Teapublikan Party sees women solely as life-support systems for uteri and then stay-at-home, raise-the-kids servants for their man. Women are trapped in the Teapublikan system and do not even realize it. "Barefoot and pregnant." Their only other useful purpose is to vote...for their Teapublikan masters.

Pattie in Maryland, I'm with you on #23.2! FR sent.

Wow....I'm sorry, I somehow confused this place with something resembling intelligent thought and dialogue. What I see, is voodoo paranoia. Gross, and I mean gross generalizations of things completely beyond reasonable fact, projected on a group of patriotic people. Is this what the left is now all about?

Are you that afraid of little old ladies and veterans who exercise their free speech, and by the way do not rape an murder others in the process? Sorry, I entered a cave of progressive hatred. So much for there 'billboards'. My mistake.

Later

I suggest a little anger management, combined with some social reality.

That didn't sound angry to me - it just sounded like reality.

FreedomRanger - I am a veteran and many of the current Republicans in many states have proposed laws to limit abortion, are proposing personhood to a fetus in hopes of controlling/outlawing birth control. Many Repubs make it sound as if women are wanton harlots who lay whit everyman who comes anlong and the runs to the abortion clinic once a week or so, so from a mans point of view and a veteran, it seems that many GOPer's seriously dislike women and want to relegate them back to "bare foot, pregant and in the kitchen".

Even one of the current top contenders for POTUS on the GOP side said birth control is NOT ok and should be outlawed (a bit paraphrased, but basically what Santorum said).

So yes many of us men and women are a little angry with these attempts (attacks) to roll back womens rights.

LOL and WOW....Pattie, that kind of post reminds me of this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSzshkg9LJ0

and then there is this and this:

it seems that many GOPer's seriously dislike women and want to relegate them back to "bare foot, pregant and in the kitchen".

The Teapublikan Party sees women solely as life-support systems for uteri and then stay-at-home, raise-the-kids servants for their man. Women are trapped in the Teapublikan system and do not even realize it. "Barefoot and pregnant."

There is a group of people who believe like that, but they are pretty much just found in the "religion of peace". You know that religion that makes women cover their face, doesn't let them go to school, drive, or have any rights, and are pretty much like the ones you just described.

Either prove your broad generalizations are true or back them up with PLENTY of fact.

ScottyW1,

Let me ask you a few questions:

1) Do you believe in the Constitution?

2) Do you believe that the Constitution is the extension of the Declaration of Independence?

3) If you said "Yes" to question 2, who do you think has a right to Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, all people or just certain people?

4) If you answered "All people" to question 3, why do you support abortion as it takes away the RIGHT to LIFE of the unborn?

Sadly, I do accept exceptions to my non-abortion stance for cases of rape, incest, and the PHYSICAL health of the mother. But, I prefer that all women that might desire an abortion for ANY reason seek adoption as a first choice. The unborn never asked to be produced in any particular fashion and are innocent of all crimes.

yes I do - I fought and bled to uphold those freedoms, I never said I agree with abortion, I don't and feel kind of like you do about it; however for now it is the law of the land and THAT is what I uphold.

vol fan - here is one quick example

"The movement is also gaining momentum in Congress: GOP lawmakers have introduced three bill that would extend personhood rights to fertilized eggs. Sixty-three House Republicans signed onto Rep. Paul Broun's (R-Ga.) "Sanctity of Human Life Act," which mirrors the Mississippi personhood language. GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann (Minn.) cosponsored Rep. Duncan Hunter's (R-Calif.) personhood bill, which would allow "the prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child," and Mississippi's own Sen. Roger Wicker (R) introduced a bill in the Senate that defines a person from the moment of fertilization."

or

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/groups/personhood-usa

or

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/rick-santorum-favors-making-birth-control-illegal/

I stand by my earlier statement

If you answered "All people" to question 3, why do you support abortion as it takes away the RIGHT to LIFE of the unborn?

Because non-viable, non-sentient tissue isn't "people"?

Hell, born people aren't considered "people" any longer if they lose certain brain functions....that's why they can be unplugged...nobody home. Fertilized eggs that haven't attained those brain functions aren't people yet...nobody home.

Something that doesn't exist yet doesn't have a "right to life".

Abortion is a medical procedure. It is between the doctor and the pregnant woman. It is not between the doctor pregnant woman and a politician.

Hey...

I've got an idea...

Stick to the @!$%#ing topic.

If you'd like to start a seed about abortion, or evil Muslims, or @!$%#ing cupcake recipes for that matter... Have at it.

This ain't it.

Yeah,his leadership potential is appealling to some! The same ones that will sign up for his dance classes, where MOON-WALKING is taught; ya know, facing one way-while moving in the other direction. The Teabaggers did say they wanted to take the country back,right???

Which is the same pathetic group, that burst on the scene wailing against TARP and bailouts; but now worship 'those' that brought those maladies upon us. The same ones that wail against govt spending, but give a free pass to those that charged to the future; TWO WARS,CORPORATE WELFARE, NOT PAID FOR TAX CUTS TO BILLIONAIRES, MEDICARE DO-NUT HOLE ect...

Yeah, these people are so angry at all the aforementioned, that they now want to elect the same losers, and put them back in charge! 'The LAND OF OZ', is indeed a strange place....