Why are we having this conversation??! Why is Hillary Clinton’s viability as a candidate for president in 2016 viewed through the filter of age? She’s healthy, she’s strong, she’s got the energy to travel more than most young people will in their entire lives, and if she win the election, she will only be 69 on election day (yep… same age as Reagan). Considering that women’s life expectancy is, on average, a full 5 years longer than men’s, that would make her 64 in man-years… when did 64 become too old to be a leader of either gender?
keyboard shortcuts: V vote up article J next comment K previous comment